| 552 | 1 | 230 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
费孝通的《皇权与绅权》是中国社会学经典著作,其深刻剖析了传统中国乡土社会的权力结构及其运作逻辑。费孝通提出,中国传统社会的权力体系呈现“双轨制”特征,即皇权(中央集权的官僚体系)与绅权(地方士绅的自治权威)相互依存又彼此制衡,这种“上下分治”的模式,既保证了国家的统一性,又赋予乡土社会一定的自治空间。把握中国政治传统的社会学意味,需要深刻地领会在中国文化及其转型的特殊性意义或背景之下,我们曾经习以为常的乡土社会的权力结构究竟是如何不自觉地自我运行的。显然,将中国社会制度的运行从基层的孤立存在上升到了权力的中央,使得我们可以借此领会一个作为整体性存在的文化与文明的连续体的意义。
Abstract:Fei Xiaotong's Imperial Power and Gentry Power is a classic work in Chinese sociology,offering a profound analysis of the power structure and operational logic of the traditional Chinese rural society. Fei Xiaotong proposed that the power system of traditional Chinese society presented a “dual-track”feature: imperial power(the centralized bureaucratic system)and gentry power(the autonomous authority of local gentry)were mutually dependent,yet checked each other. This “division of governance between central and local levels” not only ensured the unity of the empire but also granted the rural society a certain degree of autonomy. To grasp the sociological implications of China's political tradition,we need to deeply understand how the power structures of our familiar rural society operated,often unconsciously,within the unique context of Chinese culture and its transformation. Clearly,it elevated the operation of China's social system from the isolated existence at the grassroots level to the centralization of power,enabling us to understand the significance of culture and civilization as an integrated,continuous entity.
[1]费孝通.乡土中国[M].上海:观察社,1948.
[2]吴晗,费孝通.乡土重建[M].上海:观察社,1948.
[3]费孝通.皇权与绅权[M].上海:观察社,2021.
[4]雷德菲尔德.中国士绅:城乡关系论集[C].赵旭东,秦志杰,译.北京:三联书店1953.
[5]SMITH J A. The Ethics of Aristotle[M]. London:J. M. Dent&Sons Ltd,1949.
[6]Yang C K. Religion in Chinese Society:A Study of Contemporary Social Functions of Religion and Some of Their Historical Factors[M]. Berkeley and Los Angeles:University of California Press,1961.
[7]赵旭东.费孝通学术思想研究[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2021.
[8]赵旭东.费孝通与乡土社会研究[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2010.
(1)这一双轨制理论的论述集中在其《乡土重建》一书中,参见费孝通:《乡土重建》,观察社1948年版,第42—64页。
(1)清代寻求大一统的对苗族社群的教化冲动借用的对于汉族文化符号的挪借。对于这一点可参见:张中奎:《清代清水江流域乡村社会与中央王朝关系研究》,中国社会科学出版社2023年版,第161—171页。
基本信息:
DOI:10.14084/j.cnki.cn62-1185/c.20251020.003
中图分类号:K22;C912.82
引用信息:
[1]赵旭东.一个乡土社会的权力运行——新编《皇权与绅权——费孝通讲古代中国的权力运作》一书导读[J].西北民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2025,No.269(05):42-53.DOI:10.14084/j.cnki.cn62-1185/c.20251020.003.