西北民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版)

汉魏之际是思想与文学转型的关键时期，徐幹及其《中论》处于这一交汇点，但其文学家身份长期被思想家身份所掩盖，文学成就未受足够重视。本文以思想史与文学史双重视角，考察《中论》思想价值与徐幹文学史地位变迁。《中论》批判汉儒、主张“重人事轻天道”与实先名后，在经学向玄学过渡中起到了中介作用。徐幹文学地位因作品亡佚和“齐气”等学术牵累被长期忽略，经明代复古思潮与清代考据、诗学批评的重新发掘，最终确立其“建安七子”核心成员的地位。

The transitional period between the Han and Wei dynasties was a critical juncture for both intellectual and literary transformation. Xu Gan and his Zhong Lun stood at this intersection,yet his identity as a litterateur was long overshadowed by that of a thinker,leaving his literary achievements underappreciated. From the dual perspectives of intellectual and literary history,this paper examines the intellectual value of Zhong Lun and the evolution of Xu Gan's status in literary history. Zhong Lun criticizes the Confucian scholars of the Han Dynasty,advocates human endeavor over heavenly principles and practical action over reputation,thus acting as a medium in the transition from classics scholarship to Xuanxue(learning of the mystery). Owing to the loss of his works and the prejudice of “Qiqi(Qi-region temperament)”,Xu Gan's literary status was long neglected. It was not until the revival of ancient learning in the Ming Dynasty and textual research and poetic criticism in the Qing Dynasty that his literary value was rediscovered,finally establishing his status as a core member of the “Seven Masters of Jian'an”.